[Buddha-l] life force vis a vis Xianity & Hinduism

Richard Hayes richard.p.hayes at comcast.net
Mon Aug 22 09:32:34 MDT 2005

On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 09:55 -0400, Stanley J. Ziobro II wrote:

> But this seems beside the point
> inasmuch as the argument for an Intelligent Designer would likely claim
> that it is not the Designer that is being measured, hence It cannot be
> proved or disproved on the basis of the measureability of emperical things or
> data. 

You have just articulated why intelligent design cannot be regarded as a
scientific hypothesis and therefore has no place in a science classroom.
The very fact that people who like this dogma spell the words with
capital letters--Intelligent Design--shows it is just another way of
trying to smuggle God into science.

Now relate this to Buddhism in some way or drop it. This discussion has
no place here.

Richard Hayes

Richard Hayes

More information about the buddha-l mailing list