[Buddha-l] What's wrong with a little Dharma?
jkirk at spro.net
Tue Aug 30 21:39:05 MDT 2005
> "Modernistic apologetics, with its appeal to logic, proofs, and even
> common sense, therefore has proven unfruitful. It often simply draws a
> complete blank - the language of apologetics is so utterly alien to a
> Western Buddhist they simply have no idea what you're talking about (or
> alternatively, they know only too well what you’re talking about, having
> rebelled from that intellectual paradigm, and rejected it).
> "It follows then that any notion of individualism, in its Judeo-Christian
> / Englightenment sense, in terms of the individual's hallowed centre in
> consumer society, or in notions of Christian salvation is anathema. I
> qualify what I'm saying as Buddhism per se is highly individualistic, but
> Western Buddhists don't necessarily frame themselves as such in the first
> instance. "
> Sally McAra
Hey, sounds good--the western Buddhists they speak of seem to be quite well
immunized against Christian missionizing.
More information about the buddha-l