[Buddha-l] Dating of the Historical Buddha--a review article byLance Cousins

Weng-Fai Wong wongwf at comp.nus.edu.sg
Wed Mar 4 20:42:09 MST 2009


And there is also widespread disagreement about the time of the year of the
Buddha's birth, enlightenment and parinirvana. Any study on that?

W.F. Wong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: buddha-l-bounces at mailman.swcp.com [mailto:buddha-l-
> bounces at mailman.swcp.com] On Behalf Of jkirk
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:31 AM
> To: 'Buddhist discussion forum'
> Subject: [Buddha-l] Dating of the Historical Buddha--a review article
> byLance Cousins
> 
> http://indology.info/papers/cousins/
> 
> (A review article of The Dating of the Historical Buddha. Die
> Datierung des Historischen Buddha.Edited by Heinz Bechert. 2 Vols
> (of 3). (Symposium zur Buddhismusforschung, IV, 1-2) pp. xv +
> 525; x + 530. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991-2. DM 310,
> 256.)
> 
> 
> Maybe some list members (such as yours truly) haven't come across
> this article about a much discussed and analysed topic.
> 
> Joanna
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buddha-l mailing list
> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l





More information about the buddha-l mailing list