[Buddha-l] Bourgeois Buddhism

[Federico Andino]

>
> I detect at least three approaches. One is scientific, as Federico has laid it
> out. The other is a practictioner,  as I believe Jack gave us earlier.  But
> then there is the philosophical, where we want to know not only what is the
> case, and what works, but what is true, or at least self-consistent.
>
> This brings me back to my earlier question, why is the Buddhadharma different?
> --
> Andy Stroble,
> _______________________________________________

In a philosophical context, self-consistent does not necessarily equals truth.
So something can be inconsisten and true, like kinds of buddhism or my
commitment to diet.

F