[Buddha-l] Anomalous doctrines [Lusthaus IV]

[Bradley Clough]

On Mar 26, 2005, at 8:07 PM, Stephen Hodge wrote:
> As far as I can see, the broad consensus among the handful of scholars 
> dealing with this area proposes that the second path, the one relying 
> primarily on insight, is the junior path, whereas the first path 
> centred on dhyana is the older one.


Dear Stephen,
	I, and I imagine others, would be interested in knowing which scholars 
in which works make this case. I'm mostly aware of Tilmann Vetter 
making this argument. Who else?

Best Wishes,
Brad

Brad Clough
The American University in Cairo
bclough at aucegypt.edu