[Buddha-l] Re: angel or sphincter

Jim Peavler jpeavler at mindspring.com
Thu May 26 13:03:49 MDT 2005

I am rendered light-headed as a Republican by the potential opportunity  
for power on
buddha-l, and cheerfully (and humbly) accept the responsibility.

Have a swell trip.

On Thu, 26 May 2005 09:22:49 -0600, Richard P. Hayes <rhayes at unm.edu>  

> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 09:24 +1000, Kate wrote:
>> As their name implies, the Sodomites were into animals, not angels.....
> That's not what the name implies. The name implies they were from Sodom.
> Heaven only knows what the people of that town were up to, but it seems
> to be illegal in Texas and quite a few other states in the USA. There
> are limits on how one may be united in the United States.
> If our current president had his way, the ways of being united would be
> very few indeed, despite the fact that he says of himself that he's a
> uniter, not a divider. (A recent poll shows that 49% of Americanos think
> of him as a uniter, and 49% think of him as a divider. So it seems the
> citizens of the USA are evenly divided on whether they are united or
> divided.)

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

More information about the buddha-l mailing list