[Buddha-l] Religious, But Not Spiritual

[Joy Vriens]

Eric (hi) wrote:
>> Religious, But Not Spiritual: Ken Wilber & Father Thomas Keating 
>> http://padmakara.zaadz.com/blog 
>> 
>> Obligatory Buddhist content: found on a Buddhist blog 

>Just Platonism for Oprah fans, nothing Buddhist in it at all. Some  
>advaita though. 

According to Wilber one can talk about tattva (he uses another word, but I forgot what it was ;-)) from a pre-rational (magical, mythical), rational and trans-rational or integral perspective. You are obviously talking from a (pseudo) rational perspective. What would you tell us from a trans-rational perspective? And is there anything Buddhist in nirvana?

Joy