[Buddha-l] Enlightenment as dogma
jkirk at spro.net
Sun Oct 10 18:46:08 MDT 2010
>"...to be a rigorously valid belief."
>Beliefs are relative, there is no such thing as a 'rigorously
>universally, or anything else) valid' belief because rigor, like
>belief, is always more or less or 'both and'--- just like
But I should think they could be more or less well grounded which
is perhaps what was meant.
Yes, but it did not seem to me that this was what Luke meant.
More information about the buddha-l