[Buddha-l] Enlightenment as dogma

[JKirkpatrick]

>"...to be a rigorously valid belief."
>Beliefs are relative, there is no such thing as a 'rigorously
(or 
>universally, or anything else) valid' belief because rigor, like

>belief, is always more or less or 'both and'--- just like 
>generalisations.
>
>Joanna


But I should think they could be more or less well grounded which
is perhaps what was meant.

Randall 
_________________
Yes, but it did not seem to me that this was what Luke meant.

Joanna